|
U. S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
Washington, D.C. 20210 |
CLASSIFICATION
WIA/Performance CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL OWS DATE |
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 6-00, CHANGE 1
TO: ALL STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
ALL STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AGENCIES
ALL STATE ONE-STOP CENTER SYSTEM LEADS
ALL STATE WORKER ADJUSTMENT LIAISONS
FROM: EMILY STOVER DEROCCO
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT : Changes to Guidance on Capturing Customer Satisfaction Results
for Participants and Employers Receiving Services Under Title I
of the Workforce Investment Act
1. Purpose. To provide revisions to technical guidance for states to implement the core and customer satisfaction performance measures and calculate performance levels required under the Workforce Investment Act in order that the guidance contained in Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 6-00 conform to the requirements contained in TEGL No. 14-00.
2. References. Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), section 136; WIA Final Rules, 20 CFR part 666; TEGL No. 7-99; TEGL No. 8-99; TEGL No. 6-00; TEGL No. 14-00; Planning Guidance and Instructions for Submission of the Strategic Five-Year Plan for Title I of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act; WIA: Final Unified Planning Guidance; Notice of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Action No. 1205-0420, dated March 1, 2001.
3. Background.. Section 136 of WIA specifies core indicators of performance and their application to workforce investment activities in adult, dislocated worker, and youth programs. In TEGL No. 7-99, the Department issued technical guidance to states to use when calculating outcomes on the 15 core performance measures and the two customer satisfaction performance measures. Four core measures apply separately to the adult, dislocated worker and older youth participants; three measures apply to younger youth; and two measures of customer satisfaction apply across the three funding streams.
TEGL No. 6-00 outlined the parameters states are to use in conducting customer satisfaction surveys at the state level and detailed the parameters states are to use in conducting surveys and reporting results for local workforce investment boards (WIBs). Formal instructions for reporting performance outcomes (including customer satisfaction results) to the Department were released in TEGL No. 14-00 as part of the overall WIA performance accountability reporting system approved by OMB on March 1, 2001. The approved performance reporting system contained several changes to the customer satisfaction survey methodology in response to comments forwarded to OMB by states. These changes increase the methodological rigor of the customer satisfaction surveys.
This guidance letter outlines changes to the parameters detailed in TEGL No. 6-00 that are needed to conform to the increased methodological rigor published in TEGL No. 14-00.
4. Changes to the Customer Satisfaction Survey Methodology
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, Parameters for Conducting Surveys to Obtain State Level Results, items D and F on page 4.]
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, item E on page 4.]
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, item C on page 4.]
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, item H on page 5.]
The response rate is calculated as the number of respondents with complete customer satisfaction information divided by the total number in the sample size. If sampling is not used, the response rate is calculated as the number of respondents with complete customer satisfaction information divided by the total number eligible for the survey (also known as the sampling frame). A survey is considered complete when valid answers are provided by the respondents for each of the core American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) questions. Valid answers are responses 1 through 10 for each of the three ACSI questions. Responses 11 (don't know) and 12 (refused) are considered missing values and are not considered valid responses for computation purposes.
The calculation of the ACSI includes only the results from complete surveys.
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, item F on page 4.]
The following introductory script replaces the introductory statements for both the participant and employer surveys published in the original guidance:
[Introductory Script]
My name is (interviewer) with (firm or agency) and I am conducting a survey for the (program name). I would like to speak to Ms./Mr. (name of participant or name of employer contact).
Are you the Ms./Mr. (name of participant or name of employer contact) who received a (name of service(s)) from the on (date or date range)? [If the respondent confirms the receipt of services, proceed with the interview. If no, end the interview and thank the respondent for his or her time.]
I would like to ask you some questions about your recent experience with the services provided to you [substitute "you" with "your business" for employer respondents]. Our purpose is to learn from you how to improve programs and services offered to people [substitute "people" with "area businesses" for employer respondents]. The survey was approved by the Office of Management and Budget to collect information on your experience with services we provide to individuals [substitute "individuals" with "employers" for employer respondents]. The questionnaire is voluntary and should take no longer than XX minutes to complete.
Please know the answers you provide to my questions will be kept confidential. Do you have any questions for me before we start the interview? [If no, continue. If yes, probe to understand the questions, provide answers and restate the importance of the respondent's participation in the interview.]
First, I want to know your overall experience with the services. I will read to you three statements and ask you to rate your experience. [Proceed with the core ACSI questions.]
[Affected item(s) in TEGL No. 6-00: Section 5, item J on pages 5 through 7]
B. Additions to Original Guidance on Conducting Surveys to Obtain State Level Results
[The above items should be added to section 5, Parameters for Conducting Surveys to Obtain State Level Results, in TEGL No. 6-00.]
C. Updated Table of Weights to Use in Calculating the ACSI
Updated weights were calculated for use in PY 2001 by a statistical algorithm in order to minimize random survey noise or measurement error that exists in all survey data. Please refer to TEGL No. 6-00 for a description of the formulas for calculating the ACSI scores.
Specific weighting factors were developed for each state for PY 2001 and can be found attached to this TEGL. New weighting factors will be published annually. The weights listed in the attachment are to be used by each state in computing performance on the ACSI for employers and participants.
5. Action Required. States shall distribute this guidance letter to all officials within the state who need such information to implement WIA core and customer satisfaction measures.
6. Inquiries. Questions concerning this issuance may be directed to your appropriate Regional Office.
7. Attachments. ACSI Formula Weights.
Weights for Use in Calculating
State-Level ACSI Scores
September 14, 2001
| Weights | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State Name | Overall Satisfaction | Confirm Expectations | Compared to Ideal |
| AK | 0.3621 | 0.2650 | 0.3729 |
| AL | 0.4411 | 0.3096 | 0.2493 |
| AR | 0.4366 | 0.3213 | 0.2421 |
| AZ | 0.4047 | 0.3198 | 0.2755 |
| CA | 0.4244 | 0.3238 | 0.2518 |
| CO | 0.3974 | 0.3304 | 0.2722 |
| CT | 0.4328 | 0.3407 | 0.2265 |
| DC | 0.4879 | 0.3208 | 0.1912 |
| DE | 0.4430 | 0.3076 | 0.2494 |
| FL | 0.4331 | 0.3054 | 0.2615 |
| GA | 0.4252 | 0.3076 | 0.2672 |
| HI | 0.1958 | 0.6136 | 0.1906 |
| IA | 0.3960 | 0.3190 | 0.2850 |
| ID | 0.3769 | 0.3236 | 0.2995 |
| IL | 0.4023 | 0.3222 | 0.2755 |
| IN | 0.4274 | 0.3360 | 0.2366 |
| KS | 0.4092 | 0.3426 | 0.2482 |
| KY | 0.4263 | 0.3030 | 0.2707 |
| LA | 0.4350 | 0.3078 | 0.2573 |
| MA | 0.4188 | 0.3283 | 0.2529 |
| MD | 0.4215 | 0.3375 | 0.2410 |
| ME | 0.4526 | 0.2804 | 0.2670 |
| MI | 0.4223 | 0.3237 | 0.2539 |
| MN | 0.4232 | 0.3425 | 0.2342 |
| MO | 0.4288 | 0.3300 | 0.2412 |
| MS | 0.4240 | 0.3171 | 0.2589 |
| MT | 0.3908 | 0.3488 | 0.2604 |
| NC | 0.4113 | 0.3311 | 0.2577 |
| ND | 0.4297 | 0.2790 | 0.2913 |
| NE | 0.4046 | 0.3375 | 0.2579 |
| NH | 0.4266 | 0.3247 | 0.2487 |
| NJ | 0.4309 | 0.3371 | 0.2320 |
| NM | 0.4312 | 0.3193 | 0.2495 |
| NV | 0.3810 | 0.3493 | 0.2698 |
| NY | 0.4129 | 0.3336 | 0.2535 |
| OH | 0.4217 | 0.3251 | 0.2532 |
| OK | 0.4382 | 0.3111 | 0.2507 |
| OR | 0.4247 | 0.3274 | 0.2479 |
| PA | 0.4314 | 0.3287 | 0.2399 |
| RI | 0.3932 | 0.3498 | 0.2570 |
| SC | 0.4551 | 0.2986 | 0.2464 |
| SD | 0.4039 | 0.3263 | 0.2698 |
| TN | 0.4314 | 0.3177 | 0.2509 |
| TX | 0.4186 | 0.3313 | 0.2501 |
| UT | 0.4063 | 0.3323 | 0.2615 |
| VA | 0.4313 | 0.3111 | 0.2576 |
| VT | 0.4225 | 0.3266 | 0.2509 |
| WA | 0.4059 | 0.3244 | 0.2697 |
| WI | 0.4282 | 0.3133 | 0.2585 |
| WV | 0.4408 | 0.3145 | 0.2447 |
| WY | 0.4488 | 0.3272 | 0.2240 |